Proposal & Rationale

Following the Government's announcement of its intention to close Becta, the significant reductions in the Harnessing Technology budget and the subsequent cancellation of much of the BSF programme, many of us working in the educational technology field have been talking about what the potential impacts on children, young people and staff might be at the level of schools and colleges. For those of us working at Local Authority level, the need to support schools in their ongoing adoption and development of technology to support learning remains a critical one. Many of us share a commitment to ensuring all our schools and colleges are digitally literate as well as confident, able to critically use technologies to for effective, creative and safe learning and active community participation. Effectively using technology for learning is something that an increasing number of  teachers do very well. School administration, communications, and infrastructure are also critical areas where we can find some of the best examples of practice in the world. However, without networks to support and develop practice, individual efforts are isolated and decision making may suffer.

In the light of this, it makes sense to begin to look at ways that we can use technology to facilitate a new network of education technology professionals working at Local Government level. Making our expertise, conversations and concerns visible means that we can begin to share practice and work with, not just alongside, each other.

Our proposal is to set up a grass-roots national network of people working within Local Authorities to support each other in decision making, profesional development, in sharing our experiences of what does and doesn't work and where needed, in bringing about meaningful change at Local Authority level. We aren't proposing a national representative body or replacement for Becta - we do think that a federation of LA employees offers a realistic approach to making best use of resource and capacity.

Real change can only happen at local level - it needs the whole community's interest and support - and no-one who has actually tried to make the phrase 'whole community participation' a reality takes the task lightly. We need to share what has worked for us, as well as what hasn't worked, and we need to be developing our own skills by listening and learning from each other. Our proposal is for a national network provides a forum for the exchange of information, ideas, expertise and debate. 

LA workers should be embedded in the communities they support. As such we hope that the network will also provide opportunities to other members of our community - school employees, teachers, leaders, librarians, technicians. Our role is to facilitate and support communications across our localities - an organised network also offers us the oppertunity to extend local capacity and connect people nationally.

We also think that the network needs to model what it preaches, and utilise technology not for its own sake, but because we recognise the social, cultural and economic opportunities that will be squandered at individual, local, national and international level if we don't.

4 comments:

  1. I think this is exactly the right sort of response to 'Big Society' (and funding cuts). Of course we need to build upon existing networks and avoid duplication of effort (or worse still creating a plethora of networks which compete with each other).

    So the question is what other similar/related networks are already in place - and how should this one link up with them?

    N.B. I do have a vested interest here as I work on Vital - the DfE funded ICT CPD Programme which is explicitly trying to provide a top down infrastructure to support bottom up sharing by/for practitioners ... http://www.vital.ac.uk/

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'm as perplexed as PeterT. This proposal would only have validity if such networks did not already exist. For example, Naace has educational ICT professional members in all but one or two LAs throughout the country in the very roles you describe. It offers networking facilities using technology that any member can set-up though its communities.naace.co.uk facility. Why are you starting afresh, and by doing so, is not the validity of your enterprise undermined? Shouldn't you be supporting and using the networks that already exist rather than re-inventing the wheel and asking people to join yet another grouping?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi Peter - Thanks for the kind comment :) You're absolutely right about not duplicating existing good practice but looking to build on and promote it. I think one of the key things we could do at the face to face/via wiki is begin to identify existing organisations, practice and activities, and look at light weight approaches to joining up.

    Thanks for the Vital link - Nia Sutton has been in touch recently, as I'm on her beat :) Very interested in the work you are doing.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hi GD,
    I'm not sure how to respond to your thoughts. I am a happy member of Naace and work in an LA. We are simply proposing a chat about mutually supporting colleagues in similar situations in the nitty-gritty of tough times. The beauty of a grassroots network proposal is that if your negative reaction is typical and people have no need of eduLAIT, then the idea will wither and die before causing anyone to reinvent any wheels. We'll keep you posted.
    PF

    ReplyDelete